There is no hypocrisy displayed; we are parsing out the Australian nationalist position, which is neither Hitler worship nor electoral conservatism.
And Australian nationalists are ‘australiophiles.’ The BAC are not; they are the ones who anchor their identity to a foreign land.
To take the “fuck both sides” position is simply to concede the political ground to the Zionists - whether this is intentional on Lawson’s part or not, is up for you to decide. The Australian public may not care about Gaza, but the Australian ruling class certainly does. The Palestinian cause is the rightful cause recognised by nationalists across the world.
The rest of your comments are responded to by the piece itself, which indicates you have not understood our critique of Rennick.
“Fuck both sides” and “no one cares about the Gaza conflict” - despite being both cowardly and in the later case, utterly wrong - is the rhetoric coming from many bad actors in the wider white nationalist space, in particular the ones around Counter Currents and the people doing the ‘remigration’ stuff.
They all seem to say these lines with a very deliberate attempt to direct people away from supporting Palestine. We’re not saying it’s all connected and they are being paid off somehow, but one notices the pattern.
You keep sidestepping the point that the political class is making supporting Israel part of Australia’s interests, irrespective of what the Australian people may want. The government supplies Israel with weapons parts and gives them support on the international stage. That alone makes it something people should focus on.
Everything Rennick does fits the mould of the Liberal shepherd dispatched to stabilise the fringe and bring it all back to parliamentary scheming where it can be neutralised. You’ll know the type once you learn from history and follow politics closely.
This is all classic “lightswitch brain” - supporting or opposing something not on the basis of the truth or who is morally right, but because of the position taken by some third party. What the Left thinks is irrelevant to the nationalist position on Palestine. Furthermore, the Palestinian people as whole are not social progressives, as Zionist so often like pointing out.
Rennick supports the system by presenting us with yet another dead-end conservative political party that throws out some policy crumbs to draw in dissidents. To oppose this is not ‘accelerationism’, it’s radicalism.
Inky is NOT a member of AFP and we've never met. But I subscribed because of his Joel Davis article. As to your reply, that is about a thousand times less interesting (and the starting point is how wildly interesting Inky's article is) and informed than the article it attempts to discredit. It's what I'd expect and perhaps, the next one of your mob, will cut down the word count and try being witty. This is just an inside view of how bland you all are. Face it, you come from a bloc, and you act in unison, and Inky explains why. Australia First doesn't because we are truly in the third position. So, you protesteth too much. And clearly, "Everyone that questions us must be Australia First."
When you say, "I have good reason," that's irony. You have neither good nor reason. Inky is not a "they" because he's not transgender. Your comment was long because you are boring. Emotional maturity? You must be gay.
There is no hypocrisy displayed; we are parsing out the Australian nationalist position, which is neither Hitler worship nor electoral conservatism.
And Australian nationalists are ‘australiophiles.’ The BAC are not; they are the ones who anchor their identity to a foreign land.
To take the “fuck both sides” position is simply to concede the political ground to the Zionists - whether this is intentional on Lawson’s part or not, is up for you to decide. The Australian public may not care about Gaza, but the Australian ruling class certainly does. The Palestinian cause is the rightful cause recognised by nationalists across the world.
The rest of your comments are responded to by the piece itself, which indicates you have not understood our critique of Rennick.
The BAC issue is a question for another time.
“Fuck both sides” and “no one cares about the Gaza conflict” - despite being both cowardly and in the later case, utterly wrong - is the rhetoric coming from many bad actors in the wider white nationalist space, in particular the ones around Counter Currents and the people doing the ‘remigration’ stuff.
They all seem to say these lines with a very deliberate attempt to direct people away from supporting Palestine. We’re not saying it’s all connected and they are being paid off somehow, but one notices the pattern.
You keep sidestepping the point that the political class is making supporting Israel part of Australia’s interests, irrespective of what the Australian people may want. The government supplies Israel with weapons parts and gives them support on the international stage. That alone makes it something people should focus on.
Everything Rennick does fits the mould of the Liberal shepherd dispatched to stabilise the fringe and bring it all back to parliamentary scheming where it can be neutralised. You’ll know the type once you learn from history and follow politics closely.
This is all classic “lightswitch brain” - supporting or opposing something not on the basis of the truth or who is morally right, but because of the position taken by some third party. What the Left thinks is irrelevant to the nationalist position on Palestine. Furthermore, the Palestinian people as whole are not social progressives, as Zionist so often like pointing out.
Rennick supports the system by presenting us with yet another dead-end conservative political party that throws out some policy crumbs to draw in dissidents. To oppose this is not ‘accelerationism’, it’s radicalism.
Inky is NOT a member of AFP and we've never met. But I subscribed because of his Joel Davis article. As to your reply, that is about a thousand times less interesting (and the starting point is how wildly interesting Inky's article is) and informed than the article it attempts to discredit. It's what I'd expect and perhaps, the next one of your mob, will cut down the word count and try being witty. This is just an inside view of how bland you all are. Face it, you come from a bloc, and you act in unison, and Inky explains why. Australia First doesn't because we are truly in the third position. So, you protesteth too much. And clearly, "Everyone that questions us must be Australia First."
When you say, "I have good reason," that's irony. You have neither good nor reason. Inky is not a "they" because he's not transgender. Your comment was long because you are boring. Emotional maturity? You must be gay.
And you've expressed your point but proven nothing.